MINISTRY OF MARINE AFFAIRS AND FISHERIES REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
MINISTRY OF MARINE AFFAIRS AND FISHERIES REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
Home
/
Form
Form Register
Early Market Engagement Questionnaire Blue Carbon Rapid Assessment Consulting Services Oceans for Prosperity Project – LAUTRA
A
Firm Profile
B
Relevant Experience
C
Technical Capacity
D
Team Composition & Availability
E
Operational Capacity
F
Feedback on Scope of Work & Procurement Approach
G
Feedback On Evaluation & Qualification Crieria
H
Market Insights and Pricing
I
Additional Information
A1. Please provide the following general information about your firm:
1.
*
Firm Name
2.
*
Legal Status
3.
*
Country of Registration
4.
*
Year of Establishment
5.
*
Type of Entity (e.g., National NGO, private firms, state-owned enterprise, or others [please specify others].
6.
*
Number of Permanent Professional Staff
7.
*
Number of registered or non-registered sub-national networking firms/institutions
8.
*
Number of permanent staff based in Central and Sub-national
9.
Website (if applicable)
1.
*
Briefly describe your firm’s experience in blue carbon assessment and blue carbon related work (particularly in Indonesia)
. (If applicable, please list 3–5 relevant World Bank-financed and/or other donor-funded assignments completed in the last 10 years using the table below. For each, include project name, client/donor, duration, your firm’s role, key scope elements, financial instrument(s) No Duration managed, and notable results).
B2. Please indicate your firm's experience in the following areas relevant to this assignment. Mark Yes/No for each and provide brief description for any “Yes” responses:
2.
*
Blue carbon (seagrass) assessment – Tier 2 and 3 inventory
Yes
No
3.
*
Development of MRV framework
Yes
No
4.
*
PDD preparation
Yes
No
5.
*
Rehabilitation/restoration mapping
Yes
No
6.
*
Environmental & social screening / safeguards (ESMF/ESCP)
Yes
No
7.
*
Multi-province / dispersed field operations
Yes
No
1.
*
Implementation Challenges & Approach. What do you consider the main implementation challenges or risks for this assignment, and how might they be addressed through an effective delivery approach? In your answer, you may comment on any specific strategies for risk management and monitoring to ensure successful implementation. (max.250 words)
2.
*
Experience with Scale. What is the largest blue carbon activity that you have handled, and how did you maintain quality and consistency of support across multiple locations? (Max. 250 words)
3.
*
Pricing. Based on the draft Scope of Work, please provide indicative budget ranges (rather than formal quotations) that your firm would consider appropriate for delivering each of the major workstreams (e.g., mapping and spatial analysis; Tier 2/3 blue carbon inventory; MRV framework development; Project Design Document (PDD) preparation; Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA); community engagement; and rehabilitation opportunity mapping). Please briefly state the key assumptions underlying your estimates (e.g., number of sites, geographic coverage, implementation period, and level of field effort).
1.
*
Please summarize your team’s availability for this assignment: key roles you can mobilize and how quickly could they be available after contract award? (Max. 200 words)
1.
*
Describe your organization’s ability to deploy and operate in the target areas of this project. Include any existing partnerships, networks, or local presence that would support implementation in the field
2.
*
Would your firm consider forming a joint venture or consortium for this assignment? If yes, what type of partners or complementary expertise do you seek (e.g., a national NGO with strong community presence) to enhance overall capacity/delivery?
3.
*
Given the 12-month project timeline, do you foresee any challenges in mobilizing your team for this duration? If yes, provide a brief explanation of the potential challenges (e.g. staffing, logistics, timing)
F1. The table below lists key elements of the draft Scope of Work.
For each item, please indicate your assessment of its feasibility and add any comments or suggestions:
1. Assessment options: Feasible /Needs Clarification/Concern.
2. Comments/Suggestions: If an element needs clarification, adjustment, or raises concerns, please explain why and suggest any changes that could improve feasibility or encourage market participation. Also note any critical risk factors we should consider. (You may respond in bullet points; please keep comments concise – approximately 300 words total).
1.
*
Time-Series Blue Carbon Ecosystem Mapping
2.
*
Blue Carbon Project Feasibility Study
3.
*
Detailed Carbon Inventories
4.
*
Implementation of the Indonesian Seagrass Ecological Quality Index (SEQI) methodology.
5.
*
Preparation of Feasibility Studies and Project Design Documents (PDD/DRAM)
6.
*
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA)
7.
*
MRV Plan and Technical Protocols
8.
*
Community Engagement and Benefit-Sharing Strategy Document
9.
*
Map Potential Areas for Seagrass Rehabilitation
1.
*
Are there any qualification requirements you would recommend adding, removing, or adjusting to attract the most capable firms without unnecessarily narrowing competition?
2.
*
Please share your views on the proposed evaluation approach. For a complex, multi-location assignment of this nature, what evaluation criteria do you think would be most effective in identifying the best-qualified firm? (e.g., methodology, team qualifications, local presence, gender inclusion track record)
1.
*
Indicative Pricing. Based on the draft Scope of Work as describe, please provide indicative budget ranges (rather than formal quotations) for each of the major workstreams, where applicable (e.g., mapping and spatial analysis; Tier 2/3 blue carbon inventory; MRV framework development; Project Design Document (PDD) preparation; Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA); community engagement; and rehabilitation opportunity mapping). Please provide indicative budget ranges (minimum–maximum), rather than exact figures, and briefly state the key assumptions underlying your estimates (e.g., number of sites, geographic coverage, implementation period, and level of field effort).
2.
*
Based on your knowledge of the Indonesian market, are there a sufficient pool of capable firms (national and/or international) able to deliver this assignment? Do you foresee any concerns about market depth or competition?
3.
*
Are there any external market factors that could affect firms’ interest or cost proposals for this assignment (e.g., currency risks, competing donor programs, regulatory requirements)? Please list any key factors and potential impact on the project.
1.
*
Would your firm be willing to participate in a follow-up discussion (virtual or in-person) with the MMAF project team to elaborate on your responses
Yes
No
Back
Submit
Continue
MINISTRY OF MARINE AFFAIRS AND FISHERIES REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
JL. Medan Merdeka Timur No.16 Jakarta Pusat
Telp. (021) 3519070
EXT. 7433 – Fax. (021) 3864293
Email: humas.kkp@kkp.go.id
SOCIAL MEDIA
© Copyright 2025, MINISTRY OF MARINE AFFAIRS AND FISHERIES REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA